2025 High speed Challenge

End date

  • August 17th

    Votes: 4 66.7%
  • September 22th

    Votes: 2 33.3%

  • Total voters
    6
  • Poll closed .

Mr Man

Mr SPEED!
And also how come I cant find any plans online for foamboard jets for say 80-90mm edf's ? Looking to build some sort of fighter jet in the near future and get back into the hobby.
Well, probably because most people don’t have the budget to have an edf that big! šŸ˜‚. But you could probably scale something up to use that sized edf.
 

telnar1236

Elite member
3D printing isn't really all that much weaker than composites if you do it right, and they have a machined aluminum frame, and like they note in the video, it's far far easier to repair and iterate on a design. Back in the late 40s/early 50s the full-scale Vought Pirate hit almost 600 mph with a mostly balsa wood and aluminum airframe, so you don't really need as much structure for high speed as you might think - it's mostly that you need a well designed structure to avoid things like flutter.

That said, as Houndpup RC pointed out the stall speed will be very high. Having flown a similarly sized delta design weighing in at 4 kg with my F-106, it can be a challenge to get that down on a 300' paved runway with its 35 mph landing speed, and that is designed with a conical camber wing specifically made to fly well at slow speeds. I wouldn't be shocked if their stall speed is somewhere around 70-80 mph and they need to take off from an actual airport runway.

I also noticed the trailing link struts on their design seemed to be backwards which was interesting. I've never seen anything designed quite like that, but they seem well designed, and the team seems very smart, so it will be interesting to see how they hold up. It would certainly be convenient to be able to make struts like that on our planes.
 

Mr Man

Mr SPEED!
3D printing isn't really all that much weaker than composites if you do it right, and they have a machined aluminum frame, and like they note in the video, it's far far easier to repair and iterate on a design. Back in the late 40s/early 50s the full-scale Vought Pirate hit almost 600 mph with a mostly balsa wood and aluminum airframe, so you don't really need as much structure for high speed as you might think - it's mostly that you need a well designed structure to avoid things like flutter.

That said, as Houndpup RC pointed out the stall speed will be very high. Having flown a similarly sized delta design weighing in at 4 kg with my F-106, it can be a challenge to get that down on a 300' paved runway with its 35 mph landing speed, and that is designed with a conical camber wing specifically made to fly well at slow speeds. I wouldn't be shocked if their stall speed is somewhere around 70-80 mph and they need to take off from an actual airport runway.

I also noticed the trailing link struts on their design seemed to be backwards which was interesting. I've never seen anything designed quite like that, but they seem well designed, and the team seems very smart, so it will be interesting to see how they hold up. It would certainly be convenient to be able to make struts like that on our planes.
I wonder if they could add some aerodynamic landing bay doors. As they left them open…
 

telnar1236

Elite member
I wonder if they could add some aerodynamic landing bay doors. As they left them open…
It looked like the main gear actually stuck out a little bit which isn't too surprising considering how thin their wing is - and the way they designed the gear bays, they aren't actually adding all that much drag by not having the gear bay doors.

However, on the nose gear, it's a different story. There hopefully they will add one like you're thinking.
 

Zoom Master

Elite member
It looked like the main gear actually stuck out a little bit which isn't too surprising considering how thin their wing is - and the way they designed the gear bays, they aren't actually adding all that much drag by not having the gear bay doors.

However, on the nose gear, it's a different story. There hopefully they will add one like you're thinking.
If it were me I would put any landing gear at all on the plane seems like the more you add to a airplane that is going that fast the more issues start appearing.....
 

Robot_Child

Member
Just curious (so you don’t have to answer) but are you from the UK? (I’ve heard a lot of British people say ā€œmentalā€ so just wondering šŸ˜‚)
Nope. I’m Australian mate. Anyways, this isn’t an entry but it is fast. Enjoy my arrow doing a fast pass. I had to thread the needle under a power line behind the camera…

I couldn’t work out how else to share it so here’s an iCloud link lol
 

Houndpup Rc

Legendary member
To answer your post in the other thread Zoom master, I chose pusher jet because they’re stronger, easier to make, look awesome, and they can be very aerodynamic. I ran a 3536 1750kv motor, 1000mah 100c 6s lipo, and 80a esc, and definitely got it over 160 in a steep dive. A dive that the plane never was able to pull out of….. I’ve been working on a fully optimized pusher jet design that should hit 200mph. We’ve ran airfoil testing, and it’s the best one so far. I’ve also been trying to keep laminar flow over the entire airframe, but we’ll see on that one.
I wanna build it! šŸ‘
 

Houndpup Rc

Legendary member
Nope. I’m Australian mate. Anyways, this isn’t an entry but it is fast. Enjoy my arrow doing a fast pass. I had to thread the needle under a power line behind the camera…

I couldn’t work out how else to share it so here’s an iCloud link lol
Yup, that's what I thoughtšŸ‘ (I think Australia is cool!šŸ‘)