Thanks! It’s actually my first ever build. So I’m pretty excited to see how it flies!!
I think it’s an optical illusion, both winglets are the same part so they definitely match.
Here’s another angle:
View attachment 116481
From that angle both winglets look vertical. Dude, Just print it and build it! It's complicated as heck, though. I have yet to fly my first plane. I've only just built my first plane. I have, however been educating myself...
Take what I'm about to say with a grain of salt. I think you should read my stuff, decide if you agree or not, adjust accordingly or not, and just build it!
TLDR: I suggest some stuff, then I say do it or not. The important thing is to build it.
Sketchy. Very little wing surface. The body of the plane may act as a lifting surface, but not a controllable one. To my eye, you've got very little area for control surfaces. Exactly which and where is beyond my current knowledge level. It just seems like it's going to be light and fast and you need to be able to control it. It doesn't seem like you've got the wing space to do that.
Differential thrust should be considered here. I'm still learning about how that affects control surfaces, but the short is, it removes the need for some of them. Again, we're getting outside of my knowledge range.
The canards and the piece they're connected to should be one piece. Slide one canard through the hole in the fuse, hot glue the plate in the middle of the base to the bottom of the fuse. If the angles work, you could then slide the other canard through the hole in the other side of the fuse and glue that side of fuse to the rest.
Unreinforced, your nose is too narrow. First nose-in and that paper is going to pop and the nose is going to open up. I'd take a page from the FT book and run packing tape the length of your fuselage from the back, right over the nose to the "windshield" wrapping it over the sides. It'd probably still crumple, but may still be flyable.
Built as-is the green part of the wing is going to need reinforcement. From what I've watched and read, probably a carbon-fiber rod, though I've seen those have flex issues as well. I've seen square, hollow, carbon-fiber beams used to better effect, but they are heavier.
The nicely-curved vertical, purple pieces on the walls on the inside of the fuse seem superfluous. It's just added weight to support things and weight is bad. You know what? Redesign.
The main wing needs to be solid. Drop that whole purple bay. Make the main wing one part and just attach it to the bottom of the fuse. That fuse is going to be a "B" fold, and they are notoriously strong. Working the wing shape into the bottom of a "B" fold fuse? I'm not there yet. You're kind of on your with that one. I can sort of see it. Just not quite.
You *might* find that you need a tail. In that case, extend the fuse to the back before you add one. Those double pushers would make a rudder right there act really crazy.
That's my 2c, dude. I want to do what you're doing. It *may* be obvious I've been thinking a lot about it. Whatever route you take, just build it and see what it does. For me that's the beauty of this hobby. As a CAD guy, it may be even harder for you. Remember it is foam board. It DOES NOT have to be perfect. Not even close. Build. Fly. Crash. Repeat. Enjoy.