Tundra or Timber? Uff that's a tough question that bears a side by side comparison. I was thinking that either one would mean removable wings but after a quick trip to the car with the tape I see a very suspicious dimension that suggests commercial espionage by HK. I mean, really, 1300mm is just about the width of my back seat from door to door with the back seats folded down (Kia Spectra5). So that should make the decision easier right?.. not so fast, my Zephyr is 1533mm and if I turn it sideways just right, scoot the seats forward, prop it up, and it goes right in without a problem (not exactly). So the Timber at 33mm less wingspan is still a doable option.
Difficult it may be to decide but if our biggest complaint is which is best among a selection of quality birds, would we really want it any other way?
I would like 3 or more pilots to fly these and any other contender "Cubs" or bush aircraft and then state their biggest pros and cons of each (flyability, portability, versatality, quality of construction, looks, support, price, value, etc). Perhaps what we need are sticky threads comparing rc air products with grading criteria and scoring so potential buyers have a starting point in making their decisions.