As someone who has been using ardupilot for over 10 years, I will not argue about it's complexity. The ancient configurator is a big part of that since most of the features need to be configured manually with parameter settings rather than a graphical interface. That said, I'm an old school computer geek who likes the finite control it has. I have also found it to be more robust and reliable.See if you can flash INAV on it. I have found setup for VTOL to be much simpler in it, and unless you need the autonomous features, I am not sure there is a point for ardupilot's complexity.
It is good that INAV has been working tword adding in the most requested features. I have been using it since it was originally started. It will also run on more hardware that Ardupilot has never been able to support (mostly for memory limitations) I try to stay current on INAV flying mostly FPV wings, but I still prefer flying ArduPilot.
Last edited: