If FTCA eventually provides insurance, I hope they don’t suffer the same fate.
I'm not concerned with the AMA "suing the FTCA out of existence".
First, because that's not what happened to the Sport Flyers of America. They shot themselves in the foot.
https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/am...tever-happened-sports-flyers-association.html
Second, it would be the worst PR move that the AMA could do.
The AMA has made their entire business model around the fact if you wanted to fly, you had to fly at an AMA field. And to do that you had to join the AMA. Planes were too big to fly pretty much anywhere else. But then park flyers and drones came out and you could fly those anywhere. AMA fields also have a reputation of not being very friendly to new pilots. So while the hobby has grown to at least 2 million pilots (registration numbers from the FAA) the AMA couldn't even get ten percent of those pilots.
Along comes remote ID. Supposedly the AMA fights for us, but they're in a situation where the FAA is offering to force those 2 million people to either install remote ID, join the AMA, or get out of the hobby. I just can't see the AMA fighting too hard against a potential increase in their membership of a significant percentage of 1.8 million people.
If the AMA was to go after the FTCA in a legal manner at this point, it would look more like they were trying to fight a group that formed to protect pilots who don't fly at AMA fields, on top of the obvious attack on someone infringing on their monopoly.
All that said, we've also seen that the AMA is really, REALLY bad at managing their public image, so who knows?