Boberticus
Active member
Pegna P.c.1 was a racing seaplane proposal from designer Giovanni Pegna for the Italian contribute in the
Trophy Contest. (Pc =Pegna corsa (Race)) The engine and propeller of the Pc 1 pivoted up to clear the water for takeoff, landing, and while operating on the water’s surface.
Pegna’s racing seaplane designs focused on minimizing the aircraft’s frontal area, with sleak streamlined designs.
No sidefloats, it was planned lay low enough in water that wings would stabilize it on water.
This is a intruging weirdo designed plane, with its pivoting motor/prop, whot suits me perfect to build!
I was "lucky" after search, and some email,s to get a scanned copy of a "3d" drawing. Together with a few other drawings (eg, as a Peanut size rubber plan) i think i have enough to build it. Pivoting motor planned by a slow moving servo, perhaps linear? Its a build who will give my creativity on solutions on what can be done, or not. Eg. it seems like ailerons was planned against outer ends, but it has a thin "racing" undercambered wing... servos would be "misplaced" in wing.. perhaps need forget ailerons and just make it 3ch with rudder/elevator.
Approx length planned 670mm
Wingspan 750mm
ZTW 2212 1450kv motor, 35A ESC. 3-4S 1800mAh battery
(PS, i hope the brushless motor can take some water...)
View attachment 198721
Oh man the Schnieder cup had some weird airplane entries.
My personal favorite "could-a-flown but didn't" is the Piaggio pc7, a hydroplane "float" airplane built and tested for the 1929 contest.
Using the water prop, speed up up to taxi speed, the fixed hydroplanes lifting the prop clear of the water, then use a clutch to switch the engine to powering the front airscrew propeller to get it out of the water. Theoretically less drag and weight than floats, if you can get to to take off.
I think the middle photo you posted is actually of it in the only time it was on the water conducting trials., but nobody ever had the guts to get it in the air, and Italy fielded normal airplanes that year heres a write up on it. its mildly annoying how much they look alike though, like he was reusing a fast airframe with a vastly different configuration, both wildly unconventional...
Last edited: