quorneng
Master member
Nivin
The fact that many here are suggesting some type of foam board is not simply because this web site designs planes that use it but as Merv suggests it is a quick method of building a plane and it is most likely your team will have to make more than one!
Don't worry too much about aerodynamic theory. What is good for full size does not necessarily apply to models.
Pick a simple conventional model design of about the right size and use your design report to detail the 'pros and cons' of your choice. There is no 'perfect' plane design. it is always a compromise between several conflicting requirements.
For example 'hand launching' suggests it does not have to have undercarriage (good it saves weight) but you then have to consider what features are required to avoid damage on landing to the prop or itself, particularly during testing when it is carrying a 'heavy' payload.
The fact that many here are suggesting some type of foam board is not simply because this web site designs planes that use it but as Merv suggests it is a quick method of building a plane and it is most likely your team will have to make more than one!
Don't worry too much about aerodynamic theory. What is good for full size does not necessarily apply to models.
Pick a simple conventional model design of about the right size and use your design report to detail the 'pros and cons' of your choice. There is no 'perfect' plane design. it is always a compromise between several conflicting requirements.
For example 'hand launching' suggests it does not have to have undercarriage (good it saves weight) but you then have to consider what features are required to avoid damage on landing to the prop or itself, particularly during testing when it is carrying a 'heavy' payload.