telnar1236
Elite member
Looking good, looks like it should be a good FPV platform
Looking good, looks like it should be a good FPV platform
is that your own design? if so, how did you design the wings? I am considering designing my own vtol/plank wing style plane 3d printed which is why I askHere it is set out on the bench but nothing glued yet:
View attachment 254918 View attachment 254919 View attachment 254920
Yup, though as you can see it pretty small so I am hoping for a LOT of speed out of it with a 2207! 👍Looking good, looks like it should be a good FPV platform
Yup, its my design👍 So I just used a loft from two sketches and mirrored it to make the other side, then used the split tool to make the sections.is that your own design? if so, how did you design the wings? I am considering designing my own vtol/plank wing style plane 3d printed which is why I ask
The very front is a separate part so I hope to make different nose pieces that can be put on depending on what FPV camera you have 👍 (The DJI 04 LITE would be GREAT for this!)Looking good, looks like it should be a good FPV platform
awesome, good to know, thanksYup, its my design👍 So I just used a loft from two sketches and mirrored it to make the other side, then used the split tool to make the sections.
No probawesome, good to know, thanks
It should be interesting to see how quick it goes - the wing looks great, but the fuselage shape is a bit unusual - shouldn't prevent it from flying or flying well, but it may have a bit of drag to it - that said, I don't really have much experience with that shape so it might also be fine too.Yup, though as you can see it pretty small so I am hoping for a LOT of speed out of it with a 2207! 👍
Yeah..IDK..The FT arrow kinda has that too but I got 92mph on a 4s setup, and this is more more aerodynamic as well as a bit smaller, so it will be interesting to see what happens...It should be interesting to see how quick it goes - the wing looks great, but the fuselage shape is a bit unusual - shouldn't prevent it from flying or flying well, but it may have a bit of drag to it - that said, I don't really have much experience with that shape so it might also be fine too.
Yeah! The way it just took off right after launch is pretty impressive!Finally some video of the 64mm sport jet. It's quite challenging to film so it's a bit of a grey dot for decent parts of the video, but I also got footage of a knife edge pass and an inverted pass where you can at least see the plane, and good footage of the hand launch, so I'll have to be ok with it. You can tell how fast and capable it is just by how fast it's moving and the way it climbs. I edited out the part where I walk back to the stations after the hand launch since I'm just circling at altitude and you can't see the plane at all.
My solution to the hand launching challenge was to glue bits of sandpaper to the plane where you hold it which makes it much easier to keep a good grip on (this is only necessary with ABS - with LW-PLA the rougher surface was fine to hold without any additions). That said, I still plan to build a launch dolly - the plane hand launches decently now, but I'm not too good at hand launches and regardless of the plane, I have a tendency to accidentally throw them straight into the ground on occasion unless the stall speed and therefore force required are quite low.
Yeah, certainly doesn't look like it should be slow - and for flying wing designs the majority of the drag is in the wing itself which should be substantially improved by 3D printing. My only question is about the profile of the fuselage being the shape on the left instead of on the right. I don't actually know if it will be any higher in drag, but I'm a bit suspicious you'll get turbulence and flow separation in the places in red.Yeah..IDK..The FT arrow kinda has that too but I got 92mph on a 4s setup, and this is more more aerodynamic as well as a bit smaller, so it will be interesting to see what happens...
I think 3D printing is both uniquely well suited to hand launching and uniquely bad for it. It's heavy which means you need quite the throw for some of these bigger planes, but on the other hand you can have good geometry which means it doesn't get squirrelly at higher angles of attack. With about 3-4 degrees washout in the wingtips (or up to 6-8 with flying wings and deltas) the wing won't tip stall as soon or as badly as wings with pretty much any other construction method which lets you push higher angles of attack a lot more easily. The sport jet is only good up to maybe 10-15 degrees AOA, but it's fun flying my 50mm jet trainer around at 30+ degrees since it doesn't look like it should be able to do that with its long straight wingYeah! The way it just took off right after launch is pretty impressive!![]()
Yeah, you could be right..When i first started designing it was originally going to be a long range cruiser. but it's kinda evolved into a pocket rocket!😂Yeah, certainly doesn't look like it should be slow - and for flying wing designs the majority of the drag is in the wing itself which should be substantially improved by 3D printing. My only question is about the profile of the fuselage being the shape on the left instead of on the right. I don't actually know if it will be any higher in drag, but I'm a bit suspicious you'll get turbulence and flow separation in the places in red.
View attachment 254983
Looking forward to hearing about the maiden flight - it looks like it should a good plane
Thanks!Looks good Houndpup! Interested to see how it'll fly
Agreed!👍LooksgoodGREAT!!!