The 1806 I linked is very light and smaller than the 2212, it’s given great performance on my minis with APC 6x4 props, I have run it on the Tiny Trainer, SE5A and Mini Guinea. SE5A runs 6x3 for more scale flying on 3s, the Guinea is a screamer on two 5x3 Graupner props with 3s and the TT runs a 6x4 on 2s. It’s fine because it’s small.
2212 is a lot bigger so will make more power but with a comparable prop will burn more amps and be physically heavier.
In the case of the motor you have in mind the KV and size is a problem. The only downside to the 1806 I use is it’s less efficient than a slightly bigger, lower KV motor (1000-1400kv) throwing a bigger prop. They are cheap enough that losing a minute or two of flight time isn’t much of a problem, you can typically cruise around quite nicely at a low throttle on it or go nuts with more power. When you start it might be worth limiting your throttle to 75% or so with the 1806/2400. Saves dumb thumbing to warp speed.
Generally the FT planes, especially the minis, are best flown off the recommended motor and prop, lighter and more efficient is what you are aiming for with RC planes.
Sorry if ive got this wrong, its been a long day and im a bit brain dead.
Summary: both of my motors will be larger than the recommended and i might have a bad time.
Conclusion: work "backwards" from the motor and build a bigger airframe?