FlyerInStyle

Master member
Here you go - the majority of the plane should be printed with 2 perimeters and 4% infill. Some of the tail parts (tail fuselage but not tail boom and horizontal stabilizer) should be printed with 1 perimeter and 3% infill. All the control surfaces should also use 1 perimeter and 3% infill. Structural parts (the landing gear, inserts, wing spars, and control horns) should use at least 4 perimeters and 60% infill. The tires should be printed in the softest TPU you can manage with 2 perimeters and 20-35% gyroid infill depending on your preferences for how soft you want them.

For most of the parts, the orientation where they are printable should be clear, but for the fuselage parts, they should be rotated so that the arrow on each one is pointing up.
View attachment 254148 Unfortunately, this was the last plane I built before upgrading from Cura to Orca slicer, so I don't have any 3mf files.

If you've got any questions, let me know and I'll do my best to answer.
Thanks, I'll get on building it soon!
 

FlyerInStyle

Master member
@telnar1236 I am trying to slice this and am gettign something like this. I measured the wall thickness to bee 0.12mm which I am not sure is even doable for a 0.4mm nozzle. how did you slice it? image_2025-12-01_065323012.png
 

telnar1236

Elite member
I figured it out, you need to turn on arachne wall generator, it is mostly on but qidi default profiles keep it to classic for some reason. now it works perfectly!
Yeah, arachne wall generator and print thin walls should both be on to get the best prints - and the slicing mode should be set to regular and not even odd despite what it says in the Orca Slicer tool tips.
 

Houndpup Rc

Legendary member
It;s pretty much made for qidi printers only. (I have the original X-smart)
Oh okay 👍 I was gonna say, if you use a slicer like Prusa you can get better print times and results..I don't know why but I saw a video where a guy stacked Creality Print, Prusa and Orca up against each other and Creality print and Prusa did the best...At least with the print he was using.
 

FlyerInStyle

Master member
It is a bit heavier...
Yeah, but also will flex better, and has much better layer adhesion counting I may even use some petg-gf. I think that petg is a worthwhile choice for a wing spar and fuselage connectors just for its flexibility, plus it's not much material. ABS would be ideal but I have none of it and do not enjoy printing it
 

telnar1236

Elite member
Ok, thanks, I may print them in petg since I will have a ton of that on hand. Should be similar
One other thing to watch out for is that PETG does not form as good of bonds using CA - you can work around it by being careful with making sure all the surfaces join well, but it is something to watch out for. For the spars and fuselage connectors, this is less of a problem since they don't glue to anything though.