Simple Cub with Power Pack C and...what batteries

Douglas

Member
I have decided to make the Simple Cub my first FT build plane. Since the power pack C works with a lot of other planes I'm interested in building, I thought I would fit the Simple Cub with a Power Pack C, unless someone tells me that's a bad idea. What batteries should I get?
 

The Hangar

Fly harder!
Mentor
I have decided to make the Simple Cub my first FT build plane. Since the power pack C works with a lot of other planes I'm interested in building, I thought I would fit the Simple Cub with a Power Pack C, unless someone tells me that's a bad idea. What batteries should I get?
I've flown the cub with a c pack many times and it works great! I'd recommend a tattu 1800 3s lipo - they are top-notch packs!
 

mrjdstewart

Legendary member
i usually use a tattu 1300 3S when using the old C-pack on the cub. swing a 10x4.5 with 30A esc. if you go to a 8" prop you can get by with a 20A.

i would make sure to build it as a 4 channel, the p-factor with the c-pack and 10" prop is significant and 3 channel planes have a tough time.

good luck,

me :cool:
 

sprzout

Knower of useless information
Mentor
Ugh. I just watched a review which said the Simple Scout flies much better than the Simple Cub. Any thoughts on this?

"Better" is a relative term. The Simple Scout is more acrobatic, more precise...While it's easy to build and fly, it can be a handful. The Cub's "high wing" status makes it an easier gliding plane, and it'll cruise a lot better than the Simple Scout. If you're going for a first plane, I'd recommend the Cub over the Scout. That's my opinion, and my experience, though - someone here will no doubt recommend the Scout based on their flying skills. I try to think of it in the levels of "What's a good plane to start with, progress with, and still enjoy even after I've advanced?"
 

Sero

Elite member
I run my cub on the old C-pack with 1300 4s. Works great.
I agree with @mrjdstewart , go 4 channel, but I do find the plane fly's better with coordinated turns, but is not necessary.
I haven't flown the scout, so I have no input there.
 

mrjdstewart

Legendary member
if you do choose the cub make sure to support your linkage wire going to the tail. if not you will have great rudder and elevator in the pull direction and crap in the other due to wire flex. either that or use some much thicker wire.

good luck,

me :cool:
 

dap35

Elite member
If you are new to flying, I would suggest adding the FT Aura 5 to what ever you start with. This will add either 3-axis or full 6-axis, self-leveling and make flying pretty darn easy. The launch mode is amazing if you do any hand launch.
 

sprzout

Knower of useless information
Mentor
if you do choose the cub make sure to support your linkage wire going to the tail. if not you will have great rudder and elevator in the pull direction and crap in the other due to wire flex. either that or use some much thicker wire.

good luck,

me :cool:

agreed. I used some antenna tubing (like what some RC cars use for the "whip" style antennas) and ran mine through that, and glued it in place on the fuselage, as a guide; worked great at keeping it from flexing. I had to do the same thing on the Simple Soarer, and it made a HUGE difference in control.
 

moret

Well-known member
Ugh. I just watched a review which said the Simple Scout flies much better than the Simple Cub. Any thoughts on this?
I am one of them who would agree with that review. I think the scout handles much better on the ground. Its a joy to do touch and go"s with the scout. I got tired of fighting the Cub to get it in the air so it got cut apart to get the reusable parts out. I run the old B pack and the scout could use a little more power. I run 3S 2200s and made the scout to top load the batteries.
 

Spitfire76

Elite member
I'm currently building the Cub with a GT2215/09 motor (old C pack) installed and it will be the 4 channel version. I am also concerned about the long control linkages and that there is not support for the servos, just glue. For this reason I am considering placing the servos on the outside towards the back of the fuselage like some other models. I know this will add some tail weight but maybe if I use a 2200 mAh battery it will work. Anyone else done this ?
 

BATTLEAXE

Legendary member
Ugh. I just watched a review which said the Simple Scout flies much better than the Simple Cub. Any thoughts on this?
The Simple Scout is out of the box ready to fly. The Cub does take some mods just to get it to fly docile and can be frustrating. Especially for a new flyer who is trying to work on skills. It gets confusing trying to diagnose skill issues when the plane is throwing you technical problems. My 2 cents
 

Sero

Elite member
I'm currently building the Cub with a GT2215/09 motor (old C pack) installed and it will be the 4 channel version. I am also concerned about the long control linkages and that there is not support for the servos, just glue. For this reason I am considering placing the servos on the outside towards the back of the fuselage like some other models. I know this will add some tail weight but maybe if I use a 2200 mAh battery it will work. Anyone else done this ?
I would avoid putting the servos in the tail, my experience is that those are the planes that are hard to get the CG right.
Ive had the servo get loose but still glued to the paper, the paper will pull off the foam. I remove some paper off the foam where the servo mounts before glueing it on, this way it's glued to the foam. Another thing you can do is cut a piece of scrap foam of the right size and glue it between the servos to help secure them even more
 

The Hangar

Fly harder!
Mentor
I'm currently building the Cub with a GT2215/09 motor (old C pack) installed and it will be the 4 channel version. I am also concerned about the long control linkages and that there is not support for the servos, just glue. For this reason I am considering placing the servos on the outside towards the back of the fuselage like some other models. I know this will add some tail weight but maybe if I use a 2200 mAh battery it will work. Anyone else done this ?
I had no issues with lack of control authority in the stock positions. However, having them farther back shouldn't be an issue as long as you can maintain proper CG.
 

Douglas

Member
"Better" is a relative term. The Simple Scout is more acrobatic, more precise...While it's easy to build and fly, it can be a handful. The Cub's "high wing" status makes it an easier gliding plane, and it'll cruise a lot better than the Simple Scout. If you're going for a first plane, I'd recommend the Cub over the Scout. That's my opinion, and my experience, though - someone here will no doubt recommend the Scout based on their flying skills. I try to think of it in the levels of "What's a good plane to start with, progress with, and still enjoy even after I've advanced?"
Another question. I watched the build video, but I didn't hear anything about what receiver to purchase or where it mounts. Can you answer those questions?
 

sprzout

Knower of useless information
Mentor
Another question. I watched the build video, but I didn't hear anything about what receiver to purchase or where it mounts. Can you answer those questions?

Receivers depend on what transmitter you have - you need one compatible with your transmitter. For example, if you have a Spektrum, you'll want a receiver like the AR410, OrangeRX 615x, or Lemon RX DSMP receiver. If it's a FrSky, there's numerous other receivers you can use.

Mounting is pretty generic - it doesn't need to go in a specific location in the plane, necessarily - just somewhere that the servo wires can reach it. They're all fairly light, and really don't affect CG in a plane the size of the Cub.