Heinrich Dorfmann
Active member
Hi,As many of you know I loved trying to design small scale ,slow flying warbirds and am constantly told got to be careful about making sure the wing area / elevator/ rudder are big enough for a plane that size.
I Have been inspired to try one shape by @Mr Man after flattening problems when using fusion 360 which caused me to nearly give up designing forever.
My way of thinking is use a flyable wing already designed and tested for the size of plane you want and then just design the fuselage to be more scale .
Problem is there aren’t many below 40 inches And I need to go small as not got a lot of room.
I may have asked this before but can’t find it and have had a quick trawl through forums and it seems that it is possible to use a good balsa plan for the scale you want, to design the wing size / shape and elevator/ rudder( andpossibly even the formers for the fuselage ).Obviously the thickness is different but this seems to be a good source for potential wing/rudder/elevator sizes when drawing up plans
Eg check this 24 inches plan
looks like a really good plan,it’s got the cog on it etcetc,assuming it flew ,why reinvent the wheel?
There are literally thousands more on sites like aero Fred where people have obviously spent a lot of time producing what look like very good and useable plans.
As usual thanks for any thoughts
I Have been inspired to try one shape by @Mr Man after flattening problems when using fusion 360 which caused me to nearly give up designing forever.
My way of thinking is use a flyable wing already designed and tested for the size of plane you want and then just design the fuselage to be more scale .
Problem is there aren’t many below 40 inches And I need to go small as not got a lot of room.
I may have asked this before but can’t find it and have had a quick trawl through forums and it seems that it is possible to use a good balsa plan for the scale you want, to design the wing size / shape and elevator/ rudder( andpossibly even the formers for the fuselage ).Obviously the thickness is different but this seems to be a good source for potential wing/rudder/elevator sizes when drawing up plans
Eg check this 24 inches plan
looks like a really good plan,it’s got the cog on it etcetc,assuming it flew ,why reinvent the wheel?
There are literally thousands more on sites like aero Fred where people have obviously spent a lot of time producing what look like very good and useable plans.
As usual thanks for any thoughts
Last edited: