“EasyJet” - simple depron 64mm EDF

The Fopster

Master member
Hello folks. Thought I’d share this - it’s a simple EDF jet made from 6mm foam (sold for home insulation). As I’m in the UK that’s the best build material I can get hold of currently. Decent foamboard is very hard to find…
The design steals ideas from a few places - notably looking at Ben Harber’s jet designs, and also Jetworks online planes. Those things are beautiful (take a look at the ones ShadeyB has done - he does the build videos on YT and posts on these forums) but take a lot of work to build. I decided to design something similar but much easier to build that I could use to get used to flying these things, then once it’s had one too many crashes graduate to a Jetworks scale beauty!
Design is basically a box with a flat plate wing, and some minimal concessions to aerodynamic reality and a bit of “scale” shape. Currently it’s flying off 3s and it’s easy to handle - and easy to hand launch. Next steps are to add some cheater holes to increase the fan throughput and upgrade to a 4s battery.
Quite pleased with how well it turned out considering how basic it is!
A few build photos below to give you the idea of how it goes together.
Fan is a QX-Motor 64mm with a 3800kv motor. Servos are cheap 9g metal geared. Very cheap 60A ESC and currently 2200 3s battery. Flight times about 3 and a half minutes of not very aggressive flying.

236390
236391
236392
236393
236394
236395
236396
236397
236398
236399
 

The Fopster

Master member
Well it flies - and pretty well! Inverted flight is very easy, and knife edge is also quite easy although there is some "roll coupling" (which means you need to keep some aileron applied as well as rudder to hold the knife edge).

It isn't super fast - which was expected. It has a lot of frontal area due to the simple box shape. I had planned a version two to reduce the frontal area by making the front half of the fuselage narrower - which also has the benefit of increasing the potential size of the air intakes. However, it flies so well I'm not sure now whether to bother as it would make it a bit more complex to build.

Anyway - some basic prof of flight video here. I propped my phone on a rock (using the deport stand you can see in front of the plane) and flew in and out of camera shot just to get some passes filmed - the "panning camera" effect was done in iMovie using the "Ken Burns" moving crop. It worked quite well - good to know!

 

L Edge

Master member
Well it flies - and pretty well! Inverted flight is very easy, and knife edge is also quite easy although there is some "roll coupling" (which means you need to keep some aileron applied as well as rudder to hold the knife edge).

It isn't super fast - which was expected. It has a lot of frontal area due to the simple box shape. I had planned a version two to reduce the frontal area by making the front half of the fuselage narrower - which also has the benefit of increasing the potential size of the air intakes. However, it flies so well I'm not sure now whether to bother as it would make it a bit more complex to build.

Anyway - some basic prof of flight video here. I propped my phone on a rock (using the deport stand you can see in front of the plane) and flew in and out of camera shot just to get some passes filmed - the "panning camera" effect was done in iMovie using the "Ken Burns" moving crop. It worked quite well - good to know!

Your intake for the EDF starts over the wing, the video shows extra cheater holes in the fuse. Did it show an improvement?
 

The Fopster

Master member
Your intake for the EDF starts over the wing, the video shows extra cheater holes in the fuse. Did it show an improvement?
It did - significantly. Static thrust was 540g without the extra vents and about 720g with them (running only on 3s). Hand launches are now very stress free, even on 3s. On a borrowed 4s it had lots of power - hoping to get some video tomorrow.