Fiberglass and the problems of its use in wing packaging

suza

New member
Hi all
Foam is an ideal choice to use in the manufacture of small aircraft wings as a lightweight material that made me adopt it in my research studies on my plane that I love.
Just as each choice has many advantages, it also has several disadvantages that must be overcome.
After overcoming the obstacle of cutting the foam according to the required profile and obtaining a smooth surface for it and a wonderful wing front(leadingedge), as this was done using hot wire technology.
The first was the durability of foam that is insufficient to withstand the stress on it during flight, which must be lifted to overcome that stress, and after a long search, I reached the use of glass fibers in foam packaging, using epoxy as a binder and indeed the result was very good after subjecting the foam coated with glass fibers in a simulation of what is exposed to loading during flight.
Despite reaching the great result of raising the durability, there was a great negative of the packaging process, which is the very poor termination of the surface and the front of the wing, which greatly affects the distribution of pressure on the two surfaces of the wing.
Many experiments have been conducted for this, including the use of polyethylene with a thickness of 2 mm on the surface before the process of decompression and removal after it, and other experiments using the also HDBE.
These experiments led to an improvement in the quality of the surface finish and the front of the wing, but they did not reach the required level.
What is the most successful experiment for this and what should I use to get to a good finish of the surface and the LEADINGEDGE?
Pointed out to some friends the possibility of using shrink tube or shrink roll material to cover the surface after wrapping with fiberglass, but I did not find a lord after that because I could not get the characteristics of the shrink tube and the required thickness for it or even what companies are producing it, especially since it has a relatively large diameter of about 50 cm
 

quorneng

Master member
I am not sure cutting a wing profile is a good structural use of block foam. Very little of the foam volume in the wing contributes anything to its structural strength hence the need to cover it with something. To prevent local damage the wing covering has to the relatively thick and heavy compared to the foam. The final wing may be strong but it raises the question as to whether the foam is just being used as a support the skin application process.
It can be argued that a foam wing "built up" with foam ribs and top and bottom sheet foam skins is structurally sounder as much of the wing is hollow and the foam skin is placed to make maximum use of whatever properties it has. It is wroth noting that most thin sheet foam is in some way moulded so itself has a denser top and bottom surface.
With appropriate care quite a complex model can be created with no additional covering material required.
Q400Complete.JPG

It constructed from 3mm foam XPS sheet, not paper covered foam board, with balsa/foam/balsa composite wing spars.
When I first saw a Bombardier Q400 flying overhead I just had to build one making use of light weight foam skin type construction to compensate for that miserable wing area. The wing is bolted on so can be removed for transport.
A hand launch and belly land it flies remarkably well.
WhatWings2.jpg

With care it will even do a loop!
At the bottom line it is just another way of using foam in a structure.
 

Piotrsko

Master member
Hmmm nobody mentioned the weight increase a glass reinforcing will add, particularly if the materials have been bought at an orange or blue hardware store. Good for boats, cars, and roofs, but one good crash will destroy the foam and leave a lovely fiberglass shaped piece