I love my 3D printer...but it's not the best tool for every job Then again I also love my CNC but it's not the best tool either! I REALLY love having a selection of tools I built and can customize so I've ALWAYS got the right tool for the job at hand
[ Says the guy who spent more on tools than parts this weekend to fix his Truck....but that was mostly because I used it as an excuse to upgrade my torque wrench that was older than me ]
This is an excellent point and kind of the point of this conversation - what method/model/technique does the 3d printer become the best tool for the job? This is why I am still clinging to the skeleton method for some airplanes.
I was at an indoor fly on sat and there was a guy there with an American Eaglet scratch built airplane. It was beautiful and completely built out of wooden stick - no formers or bulkheads cut out of balsa sheet except for the firewall. I asked him about build time and he said he probably had about 10 hours in it. Looking at the plane the design is possible on a 3d printer, and yes it would be heavier than balsa and yes it would probably take longer to make the first one considering modeling time, but....with balsa, every airplane is approx 10 hours, but with the printer - the first one may be 20 hours, but each one after that is 4 hours print and assembly time. plus you can have the printer working when you aren't working on it so it cuts down on time overall.
Anyway, I pulled the trigger on an Anet A8 over the weekend so I guess it's time to put my money where my mouth is.
Edit: here is the plan for the eaglet I was referencing ealier:
https://outerzone.co.uk/plan_files_00/113/American_Eaglet_25in_oz113.pdf
Last edited: