Motor Wire Length

JasonK

Participation Award Recipient
Agreed but the size of the pulse does, as NCT's tests showed, hence the energy that has to be absorbed by the capacitor and the heat generated.

I have a BSEE, which is why I am curious to the data behind how they came up with 'longer power leads = broken ESC' as it doesn't make sense to me to have the ESC dependent on the battery acting as additional power filtering for the standard switching behavior. I wouldn't consider NCTs tests to show that the capacitor is going to 'burn out' from the additional length that he tested, unless was only rated for the rest voltage of the input, but that would be a _design_ issue to have a cap that isn't rated higher then the expected voltages.

without seeing waveform details of of the test (IE was the spikes just related to the voltage drop because of current over the transmission lines, back EMF off the motor, electronics switching effect, or even something else), I am not going to jump to conclusions that the longer leads are such a big deal (at least if the power wires are apprprately sized for the expected current load - we run more current in some of our planes then the breaker would brake for your house wiring and that wire is typically thicker then much of the stuff in our plans).
 

JasonK

Participation Award Recipient
for NCT's test, there was 0.15ohms added from the additional wire length and an additional .2V power change was measured.
i = v/r
i = .2v/.15ohm
i = 1.333333333A

that would only take a ~1.3A change in the current drawn between on/off to make that much voltage difference from the shorter wires.

if your over rating your ESC like you should, I wouldn't be to worried about it. if your pushing 20A through a 20A ESC... while your just asking to blow out the ESC at that point.
 

bwarz

Master member
yea OK lets think logically here too for those who have experienced failures. If you have shorter wires on the motor and using this in an airframe, likely in a twin config, where is the ESC? Shoved in the engine nacelle behind the motor which by its nature gets hot while it is running. Reference my previous post about what kills caps. Now if you shortened the power wires and lengthened the motor wires, the ESC would need to move. Away from the heat. Likely to a more roomy space. And if you were thinking about it, adding some method for airflow across the space. Assuming that you were using the exact same model of ESC, at that point, which was the solution to the failures? The wire length -or- the physical relocation with likely better thermal characteristics?
 

Mr NCT

Site Moderator
If I get a chance I'll set it back up and see if I can get a pic of the wave form. I had to run the 0 ref. way off the bottom of the screen to be able to expand the display enough to see the difference in the amplitude of the spike. Imagine a straight up line and a concave rapid down slope. So any picture will be misleading - kind of like charts newspapers show that only show a small segment but not in reference to a 0 point.
 

bwarz

Master member
If I get a chance I'll set it back up and see if I can get a pic of the wave form. I had to run the 0 ref. way off the bottom of the screen to be able to expand the display enough to see the difference in the amplitude of the spike. Imagine a straight up line and a concave rapid down slope. So any picture will be misleading - kind of like charts newspapers show that only show a small segment but not in reference to a 0 point.
I hate that. Its called creative marketing...
 

JasonK

Participation Award Recipient
If I get a chance I'll set it back up and see if I can get a pic of the wave form. I had to run the 0 ref. way off the bottom of the screen to be able to expand the display enough to see the difference in the amplitude of the spike. Imagine a straight up line and a concave rapid down slope. So any picture will be misleading - kind of like charts newspapers show that only show a small segment but not in reference to a 0 point.

don't need to do it for me, my comment was more related to the intense "this is how you must do it" comments, that weren't backed up with data/explanations. But if you want to setup the test stuff, I would be more then happy to look at the data with you (or if your going to be at Flite Fest and wanted to bring the gear, we could find each other there and look at it).
 

quorneng

Master member
Its not the resistance of the leads that creates the capacitor issue but the fact the battery is switched on/off very rapidly by the ESC (motor rpm x3?). Such rapid pulsing will create inductive voltage spikes in the battery to ESC wires. The same thing happens on the ESC to motor wires but the motor is not spike voltage sensitive.
The capacitors installed on the input side of the ESC will handle the spikes from the expected battery to ESC wire length. Longer wires will increase the maximum voltage of the inductive spikes and so increase the duty of the capacitors. At some point for both wire length and time this extra duty will cause capacitor failure and the subsequent failure of the components in the ESC
ESC to motor wire length is not limited in this way but only by the loss of performance (voltage drop) resulting from the wire resistance

It works for me.
 

Mr NCT

Site Moderator
@quorneng and I will probably always disagree on this. The theory he's explaining may or may not be correct, my EE came before inverters like escs. In my real world tests - see post #8 - I did not see evidence of the predicted outcome.
 

skymaster

Elite member
I think there should be no problem just add the bullet connectors. Unless you are not going to put the motor back on a drone, then cut to fit as needed. If you guys remember david added an extension between the EDF on the biggen and had no problems. trial and error or how we say here, build, crash and repair and have fun. good luck.