The 4" FPV Racer Revolution is Coming! Are you ready?

catalystmachine

New member
As few as 3 years ago FPV racing was in it's infancy. The majority of people were flying racing machines around 250mm in size swinging 6" props. Then in summer 2015 everyone started to move over to 210"ish" sized machines designed to fit 5" props. Its seemed very sudden. All of the sudden... WHAM! 6 inch was out and 5 inch was "in". Now most racing quads you see on a track spin 5" props. Typically larger 6" props machines are used for Freestyle. Why did this happen? Why was there a shift to smaller size craft as the GO-TO race setup?

Answer: Advancement in power system technology

Summer of 2015 the Charpu QAV 210 led the way into the 5" craze. The designers realized as power system technology improved they could produce better performance for a race craft from a smaller package. 2205 and 2206 sized motors came out that could swing 5" props and make thrust values no one dreamed possible, back in "ancient 2014"! This ability to pack high thrust into a smaller package led the industry to progress to smaller craft. This means similar thrust/weight as a 6" machine but with less inertia. And as we all know inertia is the enemy of a racing craft. Higher inertia means it takes more power to change direction and directional changes are slower. It doesn't just stop there. There are other advantages to using smaller drone racers. Namely price and crash durability. In general price of smaller components is less than a comparable component intended for a larger craft pulling more amps. Look at 30 AMP ESC pricing compared to a 20 AMP ESC pricing, for instance. Then there is durability of parts. A larger craft has larger components that hold more mass. In a crash this means more force on parts which translates into higher stresses and more broken parts. The higher the mass the more broken parts. Its a simple equation.

At Catalyst Machineworks we believe there is an upcoming revolution on the horizon. This is a movement from 5" race craft down to 4" race craft as the "GO-TO" setup. There is a new breed of motor coming out now in the 1407 size which has the ability to produce unbelievable thrust for their weight swinging a 4" prop. Take the new Brother Hobby 1407-3600kv motor for instance. This cute little bastard only weighs 15 grams but yet can produce peak theoretical thrust (aka thrust test stand) of 750g on 4045 two blade props! Now you may say, "Yea but a 2205 can make 1400g thrust on 5 inch props". Well this is true, but a light weight 2205 motor also is around 27g - 30g, depending. So for both motors we have about the same thrust/weight ratio 50/1 but yet the 1407 motor has less INERTIA on the craft as you move it through the air. This means the craft as a whole has better maneuverability compared to a 5" machine, as long as you choose components on the rest of the craft with less weight in mind, ESC's, FC, PDB, Lipo, props, RX, etc, and most important the frame itself. All these items need to be selected to keep weight as low as possible. Designers of FPV electronics are making it easy too! With smaller and lighter gear coming out constantly. PDB/FC combos, 4in1 ESC's, smaller single ESC's, smaller lighter motors, smaller and lighter VTX. The list goes on and one.

Enter the Catalyst Machineworks SuperLight 4R. This is a project we currently have going on which is intended to lead the way into this brave new world of 4" racing craft. It is currently a prototype and we are actively flushing out the design to bring it to production. It builds on our popular SuperLight 5" machine we have been selling for a number of months now using the same design principles and elements. However, this one is designed around 4" props and the 1407"ish" sized motor as the ideal power plant to give this bird the ability to compete against and beat a comparable 5" craft. With the 4R we can produce similar thrust/weight but have MUCH LESS INERTIA than a 5" craft. All up weight (AUW) possible with this guy is around 165g before lipo. Its designed to be used with a 850mah - 1000mah 4s lipo. So AUW with 850mah of around 265g or so. The pictures below show my personal proto with an AUW of 175g before lipo. Mine is a fat ass since I don't have a proper FPV antenna on it and am using the optional arm braces. However, my team pilots are all receiving these prototypes soon for further testing and I can assure you theirs will be lighter than mine. Its sort of a competition between them lol.

So what does it feel like to fly this bird? Well, the top speed is similar to a very powerful 5" craft on 4s or 5s. However due to the massive reduction in mass it simply maneuvers better on the track than a 5". Acceleration out of a corner is faster. Deceleration into a corner is faster. Its easier to hold a line in the corner due to less momentum trying to pull you off line. When you make a mistake its much faster to correct. In three words. Its MIND BLOWING.

Videos coming soon... Here are some pics and specs of my proto.

http://www.catalystmachineworks.com/collections/fpv-racing-frames/products/superlight-4r

Frame: Catalyst Machineworks SuperLight 4R
Size: 167mm
Bare Frame Weight: 35g (fully dressed with all fasteners and 3D parts)
AUW Possible: 265g "ish"
Frame Config: XL
Props: 4 Inch
Bottom plate: 2.5mm carbon finish (with option for 3.5 for fattys)
Top plate: 1.5mm carbon matte finish
Camera: Accepts 1/4" mini cam or HS1177
Ideal motor: 1407
Ideal lipo: 850mah 4s





















 

Jugsy

New member
I'd almost turned my back on 4", just couldnt get the results that 5" machines were putting out. But lately a few guys in my local club have built super light 4" machines that blow my mind. I'd be surprised if 1407s are really good enough to make this competitive with your average 5" but I'll keep an open mind :p
 

catalystmachine

New member
I'd almost turned my back on 4", just couldnt get the results that 5" machines were putting out. But lately a few guys in my local club have built super light 4" machines that blow my mind. I'd be surprised if 1407s are really good enough to make this competitive with your average 5" but I'll keep an open mind :p

Excellent! And that is what its all about. Having an open mind an trying new things. Its human nature to want to stick with what you know. Once you try a machine like this yourself the advantage becomes apparent immediately.
 

Ocean

Member
Interesting concept and I respect your work. I love the design of the stigg. Its good to see some companies pushing frame design forwards.

One question is can the battery take it? Especially if its only 850mAh.

I think there are lots of things that need to be taken into account to see if this concept really works. For example the much greater torque of 2205 may cancel out the lower moment of inertia that the 4" quad does. Another point to make is that recently stretched X frames have become more popular. This is thought to be because they have a higher moment of inertia in the pitch axis, meaning stability in the pitch axis. But it is still agile on the roll axis for turns on a race course.

Only way to find out is to build one and give it a go.
 

catalystmachine

New member
Interesting concept and I respect your work. I love the design of the stigg. Its good to see some companies pushing frame design forwards.

One question is can the battery take it? Especially if its only 850mAh.

I think there are lots of things that need to be taken into account to see if this concept really works. For example the much greater torque of 2205 may cancel out the lower moment of inertia that the 4" quad does. Another point to make is that recently stretched X frames have become more popular. This is thought to be because they have a higher moment of inertia in the pitch axis, meaning stability in the pitch axis. But it is still agile on the roll axis for turns on a race course.

Only way to find out is to build one and give it a go.

Thanks for the kind words on our Stigg. Its a wonderfully odd creation that just happens to work. Somehow...

With an 850mah pack on this 4R I get around 2:15 to 2:30 if I am REALLY pushing it as hard as I can. If we step up to a 1000mah pack I believe it would be sufficient for about 2:45 to maybe 3:00 under hard racing. Keep in mind this system is much less weight with smaller motors and less amperage draw. With a proper 75C rated pack I am not having any sag, even on 850mah. With regard to torque on the motor keep in mind that when you scale things down you don't need as much torque. A lotus doesn't need a 454 monster engine to kick the ass of a C5 corvette around the road course. It can do it with a lighter smaller engine with less torque because the whole car carries less momentum into the corners and has less mass to lug around...
 
Last edited:

Habakkukk

Fly Eagles, Fly!
Man that's awesome. My first racer was a 4" tweaker 180. I took it out to your speed challenge in Blytheville Arkansas last Memphis and you guys clocked it at 75mph. Pretty soon after that I moved on to 5" and I haven't touched 4" since. I saw your other post 4" superlight post on the Mqc Facebook page and had a little nostalgia. I'll keep an eye out for the release, I'm keen on giving 4" another go.
 

catalystmachine

New member
Man that's awesome. My first racer was a 4" tweaker 180. I took it out to your speed challenge in Blytheville Arkansas last Memphis and you guys clocked it at 75mph. Pretty soon after that I moved on to 5" and I haven't touched 4" since. I saw your other post 4" superlight post on the Mqc Facebook page and had a little nostalgia. I'll keep an eye out for the release, I'm keen on giving 4" another go.

That is the spirit!
 

cranialrectosis

Faster than a speeding face plant!
Mentor
I love my Alien 4" (sorry catalystmachine for Aliening you again). You have a beautiful copter and a nice clean build. Love the red, printed parts.

The props are harder to break and in my tight course, it out corners my other quads. It's light, quick, fast and hard to break. It presents a small profile to the wind so it cuts through a reasonable gust with ease. I run 3000kv 1806s and with tri-blade HQ 4" bull nose props the thing is a screamer for sure.

I'm surprised more people aren't flying 4" due to the durability.

The downside of 4" is weight/inertia if you carry a GoPro. Adding a 90 gram part to a 250 gram copter is a HUGE shift. You lose a lot of the benefits of 4" with the GoPro where with a 5" or 6" you don't feel the GoPro nearly so much. If you don't fly with a GoPro, the 4" experience is FANTASTIC.
 

catalystmachine

New member
I love my Alien 4" (sorry catalystmachine for Aliening you again). You have a beautiful copter and a nice clean build. Love the red, printed parts.

The props are harder to break and in my tight course, it out corners my other quads. It's light, quick, fast and hard to break. It presents a small profile to the wind so it cuts through a reasonable gust with ease. I run 3000kv 1806s and with tri-blade HQ 4" bull nose props the thing is a screamer for sure.

I'm surprised more people aren't flying 4" due to the durability.

The downside of 4" is weight/inertia if you carry a GoPro. Adding a 90 gram part to a 250 gram copter is a HUGE shift. You lose a lot of the benefits of 4" with the GoPro where with a 5" or 6" you don't feel the GoPro nearly so much. If you don't fly with a GoPro, the 4" experience is FANTASTIC.

Thanks for the kind words. And YES I agree the 4" super light weight FPV experience is something to behold. Doesn't make sense until you try. I agree the downside currently to this type machine is you can't realistically carry a standard HD camera (gopro, session, runcam, etc). However, as technology continues to improve we will begin to see very light weight full HD cameras coming out designed specifically for FPV. Also, at some point (sooner than we think) we will see full HD FPV similar to Connex but much smaller and more light weight. At that time, sub 5" machines will really take off in popularity. There will be ZERO downsides at that point.
 

catalystmachine

New member
SuperLight 4R + HS1177:
For those of you who aren't so worried about saving the extra grams here is the included HS1177 sized camera option. The frame will come with an extra top plate, camera side plates. and all extra hardware needed to install HS1177 or swift. Max angle is 65 degrees. There will be an optional camera hood (sold separately) designed to give added protection for the camera in rollover crashes.







 

Attachments

  • IMG_7027.JPG
    IMG_7027.JPG
    1.2 MB · Views: 0
  • IMG_7029.JPG
    IMG_7029.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 0

mpbiv

New member
SuperLight 4R + HS1177:
For those of you who aren't so worried about saving the extra grams here is the included HS1177 sized camera option. The frame will come with an extra top plate, camera side plates. and all extra hardware needed to install HS1177 or swift. Max angle is 65 degrees. There will be an optional camera hood (sold separately) designed to give added protection for the camera in rollover crashes.







Glad you guys finally caved on this LOL.....

....you'll be much better off in the long run when it comes to sales. Those little micro CMOS cameras are terrible, and the 7g weight difference for an HS1177 is well worth it (even on 3"). A lot of guys, myself included won't fly CMOS cameras.