USPS is showing my package from Twitchity as out for delivery, so I started doing a bit of a tear-down/post-morterm on the ubmq attempt.
In doing so I'm kind of wishing I had enough parts to keep this frame alive as I may have found the root of the problems I've been having since switching to the polycarbonate plates. Not sure how it happened but apparently one of the plates got rotated 90 degrees. And due to the inaccuracies in this design from how I made it that threw off the screw holes in that plate. I had marked the plates to keep them aligned, but the mark on that lower plate seems to have rubbed off - I could have sworn it was still there when I assembled it all...but I was in a rush and must have made a slip up
Here's the plates as they were installed:
And here's how they were meant to be installed:
Doh! No wonder it twisted so badly when I torqued down the nuts! Look how far off those holes were. In the correct alignment a few of them look off but that's just a trick of the camera and lighting on the clear material. Trust me, in that second photo every screw slides right in with no slop.
I just re-assembled the bare frame without any electronics and it now sits perfectly flat and square with no warp. No wonder it was so much worse with the poly plates compared to the plywood plates! Looking at the brightside...now I know what a warped frame acts like in the air
Someday I'd really like to revisit this idea - I would make a template on the computer for the center plates though to make sure they're square and symmetrical. I'd also try to find or rig up a drill press for drilling the arms to reduce error there. I suspect that these plates would work a lot better installed correctly, but one of the holes has wallowed out, another one is spider webbed with stress fractures, and the
Of course - the problem of tumbling off hover existed right from the start and I've yet to work out what's causing that. Still really hoping the new frame solves that.
One thing I had planned to share in this thread but never got around to are weights of individual components. I was pretty anal about weighing everything as I worked on this and wanted to document how much all the bits weighed to help find places to reduce weight. I did one last round of measurements during disassembly so here they are at least
If anyone is interested in any of the pre-build weights let me know and I can dig them up, but since this project is going into the "Let's not call it a failure, it was a learning experience" pile I just don't feel like spending the time to share all those details until I revisit this idea - since I do want to revisit it now that I found this major problem.
Everything but the frame (ESC's, motors, wire loom, afromini, spektrum sat)
And all of the frame bits:
Hardware alone was 30g - switching to aluminum could probably drop almost 20g here:
Arms come in just under 40g - not sure there's much that could be done here to make these any lighter without significantly reducing their strength. Then again all failures were at the two mounting holes, the larger central hole under the motors never had any issues despite some hard hits that dented the wood at the ends around the holes. So maybe some holes to remove material would be ok....experiment for another day or someone else:
Polycarbonate sheets came in at 40g, I was quite disappointed by this. I can't find the original plywood plates and didn't photograph their weigh in...but they were about 9g lighter. The polycarbonate should be stronger, and being able to see the LED's on the board and the programming holes was very nice. But if you're going for lightest weight I'd stick with ply, it's ugly but it's lighter and plenty strong for this use:
My motor mounts were a big win from this I think. Only 10g most of which is the SS screws. With double lamination they proved VERY strong and barely flexed even when the screws where tightened WAY down. At first I was thinking if I did this again I'd go with shorter screws and something thinner for the straps...but seeing how well these worked I've changed my mind and would do them almost identically. Big thing I'd do differently is I'd scratch up the plastic cards before gluing them to the ply as a few did delaminate and they lost a lot of strength when they did.
I even measured the 3M tape I used to mount the ESC's (2 pieces stacked on top of each other for padding on each ESC). Didn't expect it to even register but apparently I was using 2g worth of tape. Hmmm:
I can't really call this frame a success...but I did learn quite a lot from it. The plywood hotel room key laminate material really impressed me for it's strength. I'm half tempted to try making an entire quad out of it just to do it
The afromini I've been really happy with - though the lack of USB does make it somewhat more tedious to tune which resulted in me doing less experimenting than I had hoped to. I also learned a lot of things not to do (Don't sand the arms unless you can do it in a way that keeps them all even!) and better ways to do things. So as a learning experience this has been 100% worth it. And it did fly and fly fairly well. It was very acrobatic and with not unreasonably high rates was able to do ridiculous flips. It doesn't have the speed or durability of the warp I was flying but for about 1/3rd the cost it still put a nice smile on my face. That said, there's something to be said about a quad that comes home in one piece even after way too many epic crashes and I do miss the warp speed - not that I really need it yet at my skill level. Build this with 2204 motors and I suspect it would have been a lot closer to the warp in speed and performance. Add some KISS esc's and it could really be a lot of fun - but then the whole budget thing kind of goes out the window! Though if I had the choice between a warp with BS12's or one of these with KISS esc's....I'd go for this and the KISS by far.
A $3 frame (though I didn't really spend anything on mine at first since it was made out of bits I had laying around.) can hold it's own against a $100 frame if the parts installed on them are equal. But the $100 frame will give a lot less frustration and keep you in the air longer by surviving far more crashes. Personally if I could afford it I'd go with the warp frame. I can't afford it right now though so it's kind of speculative question for me