Great idea, I didn't think of that...That is what all these skins are for that are available on this forum. Check in the Resources. I watched a video on it and they take off the DTFB paper on one side and REPLACE with the printed skin. It even suggested using the better grade 24# paper and using 3M 77 spray glue. It probably doesn't add any significant weight... certainly less than putting poly and painting! That adds a lot of weight!
Yeah I have bought from balsa cabin before or https://stevewebb.co.uk/index.php?srch=DepronHey @shadeyB where do you get your Depron? I seem to have to look in a hundred places whenever I want to restock. Had a look on Jetworks online but their sold out of the white sheets.
I finally found a source on an Essex based site called the Balsa cabin. The weird part is you order it without entering payment details then they say they'll contact you to sort payment. So I'm half ready to be told it's out of stock afterall.
Exactly, why my question to people that have done it. It sounds like you might not know what I'm talking about... Can't do these with colored paper or with paint (at least not me). Wondering would you have anything left after doing the Spitfire or Fokker DR-1.
F-18 Super Hornet - This is more like decals - https://forum.flitetest.com/index.p...f-18-super-hornet-decal-placement-sheets.318/
Spitfire - Note panels seems and lettering, and camo blending instead of sharp lines between.![]()
FT MM DR-1 Triplane -
![]()
![]()
fresh of the table and out the paint shop
Jetworks SU-27 finished in Ukrainian Livery
6mm Depron with some 3D printed parts for scale look that I couldn’t carve from foam
Absolutely love it 😍
FMS Twin 64 running 4s
and 1 crazy little pilot inside praying for better weather soon
View attachment 234515 View attachment 234516 View attachment 234517 View attachment 234518
fresh of the table and out the paint shop
Jetworks SU-27 finished in Ukrainian Livery
6mm Depron with some 3D printed parts for scale look that I couldn’t carve from foam
Absolutely love it 😍
FMS Twin 64 running 4s
and 1 crazy little pilot inside praying for better weather soon
View attachment 234515 View attachment 234516 View attachment 234517 View attachment 234518
In my city copy shops like kinkos vary from store to store including price and expertise. They are expensive. Try to find a shop that prints architecture or construction plans. They will be cheaper and higher quality. Plus they can print it full size. Even so color printing is pricey.Thank you... that was the confirmation that I was expecting, but didn't know. I've never had good luck with InkJets. I buy one... use ten sheets out of it and when I go to use it next time, it's all dried up.
I switched to a Laser, but I don't want to use toner in those rates either!
I think I heard/read that copy shops like Kinkos can do them... and even if its $5/page it sounds like a better deal than on my own printer at $100+ for a toner color.
Question for 3D flyers: how do we mitigate torque roll?
I'm working on an Su-26, which will have a 65cm wingspan and an 8x5 three-blade prop; that will no doubt give a lot of torque to manage. Now, with a 3D plane having giant control surfaces, I have a few options to counter the torque and I'm wondering which approach is best. Do I...
A) Off-set the angle of thrust like I normally do?
Jut a WAG, but it seems to me, the shorter the wing span and the lighter the air frame(less inertial/centrifugal mass), the more prop/motor torque will effect the roll.@mastermalpass - not an expert here but I've asked a few about setting up 3D planes. There answer has universally been no offset - no up down right or left. My mini pattern ship flys great with no offset. Which has got me to wondering why I've been putting so much offset in on some of my planes.
Because my grandfather restores and flies real Stearmans, I've always been around them. I decided to build the Stearman because I had a balsa wood kit for a rubber band powered model lying around. I took the plans to Staples and had them scaled up to a 40-inch wingspan before constructing it. To create a beautiful (completely foam board) fuselage, a box is surrounded by formers and an outer skin. The wings feature a new wingtip technique for more realistic wingtips, as well as a box spar inside the wing.
I would leave everything straight, and counteract the torque roll with manual ailerons.Question for 3D flyers: how do we mitigate torque roll?
I'm working on an Su-26, which will have a 65cm wingspan and an 8x5 three-blade prop; that will no doubt give a lot of torque to manage. Now, with a 3D plane having giant control surfaces, I have a few options to counter the torque and I'm wondering which approach is best. Do I...
A) Off-set the angle of thrust like I normally do?
B) Counter it with Rudder Trim?
C) Counter it with Aileron Trim?
D) Mix Aileron with Throttle?
E) Use a bit of two or more of the above options?
@mastermalpassWhich has got me to wondering why I've been putting so much offset in on some of my planes.
Banana cub. Love it.