Hello
Was referred here dkj4linux
My response on his
MPCNC 2826 Brushless RC Motor Foam Cutter page
Question...how much throw is needed? Isn't this thing equivalent to a "tattoo gun" why not use electromechanical coils, and a heck a simple flexible plastic armature bar, or even an electronic solenoid actuator?
I am still in the process of building my MPCNC (almost have all the part printed and waiting for tax return to order all the electronics) but definitely want to start cutting foam board (for planes and the cool 3D skeleton model thingys)
The closest I have seen to what I described above was the dual bearing setup, and using the flex of the wire as the crosshead bearing.
Seems like someone already thought of that
http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:776358
Also there is this thing
http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1481782
Not to mention the ready made tools available
https://www.amazon.com/Round-Liner-Tattoo-Needles-Pack/dp/B001DC5IU6
Welcome, Warhawk! I see you found us okay. One thing you will note here... this is a place not only to talk about stuff, but do it... or at least make the attempt. Most of us like to work with our hands, and our tools, to make stuff... and everybody seems to get a real big kick out of trying to "do the impossible, with next-to-nothing, in no time flat"
First, I apologize for the length of the thread... but it will be worth your time to work your way through it; i.e. there's lots of good information throughout. This started as an introduction to cutting foam with a reciprocating needle cutter I developed 6-7 years ago (not my original idea... but adapting to conventional 3-axis CNC was), to cut fanfold insulation foam for RC aircraft. And since it's primary use is with a CNC machine... those are fair game, too. And other tools are potentially of use as well... drag-knives, lasers, dremels, etc... so they are not off-limits either. Everybody seems to be extremely happy with the "spirit" of the thread and its content and the information sharing is tops... and there are some really talented -- and extremely helpful -- folks here.
The KISS philosophy the original cutter is based on has been tested over and over again... and continues to hang around. The last 25 pages or so, we've looked at a number of ways to straighten the path of movement of needle-in-guide and it has resulted in major improvement to the original cutter... with only simple modifications. Cutters with more moving parts have been devised -- and demonstrated -- but largely they suffer when it comes to simplicity, durability and performance.
But it's all fun to play with. And I hope you like to get your hands dirty. Based on the ideas/questions you have, I'd suggest reading through the last 25 pages or so to get an idea of where we've been and what we've looked at... and then join in the discussion. Everybody is friendly and helpful and seems to be having a ball.
Welcome to the party!
-- David