This is a long update post on the F-14 project, to make a long story short, the v2 is finished excluding some final paint and decals. I flew 3 flight with it yesterday. It flies extremely good, much better than the v1 which had a lot of backlash on the elevons, this one has barely any. The 2 first flight were just fiddling around trying to get all the flight modes trimmed. Although it has excellent flight characteristics its still the most stressful plane I have flown since my balsa model days because it has so many functions and different flight modes that I need to think about. I really need some time and many flights to get used to this before doing some knife edge sweeps. Here is a raw uncut video of the third flight.
Numbers:
Length: 1260 mm (scale 1:15)
Wingspan: on 20-68 deg. sweep: 820-1350 mm
Mass: 2000 g
Static thrust: 1900g at 90A
My stuff:
Receiver: Frsky X8R
Edf: 2x fms 11 blade 64mm 3150kv
ESC: 2x 60A skywalker
Batteries: 2x 4s 1400mah 45C
2x Emax ES09MD metal gear servo for the elevons
2x Corona DS-239MG metal gear servo for sweep
4x generic sg90 servo for the rudders and flapperons
In the rest of this post I will cover the wingbox design, the flight modes and some static stress simulations, if that sounds interesting keep reading.
Flight modes
Im using the frsky x9 lite transmitter and this is the first time Im using it on a plane. It was confusing at first but now when I got the hang of it I really like opentx firmware for the freedom it gives to make more complex planes. I made it so it has 3 flight modes, extended, half- and full sweep. Each flight mode has its own elevator trim, travel adjust and expo for the stabs. Flapperons work only with the extended mode. Flaps go up automatically if I sweep accidentally with flaps down. I noticed that the flaps makes the plane dive so I need to mix some elevator with them.
Wingbox design
The geometry of the v1 wingbox had this design flaw that it could not handle any torsion around the traversal axis created by the center of lift behind the hinge, especially in the swept position. This is why the top carbon plate has also the diagonal support part. The neat thing about this wingbox is that only the main carbon plates are glued to the plane, everything else can be disassembled by unscrewing the m3 bolts. There are 3d printed m3 nut housings under the main plate so the bolts didn't get stuck in glue.
Static stress simulations
Just for the sake of learning and fun I ran some static stress simulations in fusion. This might look all fancy and complicated but its actually not any magic. The user just inputs various parameters and conditions such as constraints, forces and moments and the software creates the mesh and takes care of the calculations. Its called the finite element method (fem) (if you want to sound like you know what you're talking about) Now I need to mention that due to numerous factors like my lack of knowledge of aerodynamic forces, me not having the exact mechanical properties of the carbon fiber Im using, the fact that it is mounted on top of very non-rigit airframe etc. this is only a very rough estimation. I was mainly interested if there is any obvious stress concentrations or weak points.
I made some very rough and simplified calculations of forces that acts on the 5mm steel pin hinge on 5 G’s and the results show that the stress in the carbon parts stays quite low, partly because fusions default cf properties are overestimated I think but also because the carbon parts are not the weakest link of my wingbox. In the two pictures you can see two different kind of result plots, static stress and displacement. Static stress means the stress in the material and it can not surpass the yield strength of a material or in case of carbon fiber which does not really yield it can not surpass the ultimate tensile/compressive strength. The displacement plot shows how much the part has been displaced by the elastic deforming.