OK, so I'll bump this thread!
Going back to the main question, quad or tri; I started considering both.
The tail yaw servo on Windestål's design costs just as much as a new motor and ESC. So for me a tri and a quad are equally priced. However the quad, not having a yaw mechanism, is much simpler to construct and tougher in crashes. Yet the tricopter, having one less motor, saves a bit more battery.
So, I can't decide. I've been working on a
tricopter frame so I'm morally inclined to do that first.