Alright guys, it's time to dial the discussion back to civil and reasoned posts. This is starting to get way to personal. This forum is not the place for name calling, disparagement or the questioning of intelligence or motives - there are plenty of other places for that. If anything here is making you angry take a deep breath and count to 10.
People on forums unfortunately can't be civil much anymore, it seems. I left a few years ago over transmitter wars. I had said that I liked Spektrum radios, and immediately several monkeys in their cages started getting riled up and flinging poo. It's an opinion, people are allowed them, but if you have to take to nastiness and vitriol, it's not helpful to anyone.
I came back tonight to see if the FTCA had other sites besides Edgewater that had been approved, as I'm curious what the processes would be if I wanted to fly at an FTCA site but I wasn't a paying member for the FTCA. I've also been looking to see if any sites by the FPV Freedom Coalition have been approved, and if I'd need to be a member of theirs in order to fly there. The last one, STEM+C, only has one site cleared per their website, and it's a middle school north of Prescott, AZ.
I think we should all have a Remote ID device of some sort. Not that we HAVE to fly with it, but for those of us who travel with our aircraft. What if you go to a site that has applied for their FRIA but hasn't gotten it yet? There's a good possibility that the field may not let you fly and jeopardize their chances of getting FRIA approval. Or, if you go to a location that really isn't going to get a FRIA because of where they're at, but they can still fly RC there.
Prime example - the Silent Electric Flyers of San Diego. Their field is located in Mission Bay, about 1/2 mi. from San Diego's Lindbergh Field, and about 1000 ft. from Sea World San Diego. Directly to the south of their runway is a very busy street, Sea World Drive; maybe 1/4 mi. east is Interstate 5 freeway. Directly to the north of their runway is Fiesta Island, a popular waterskiing and personal watercraft area. They've been denied their FRIA application, and the club president has said that they realistically think their chances of getting a FRIA is about 10% because of their proximity to public beaches, the amusement park/aquarium, and various busy roadways. They've also had incidents of members flying over Sea World Drive, over boaters on the water, and on occasion going over their altitude limit. Unlike most areas, they are limited to 200' by their flight agreement with the Western Division - Air Traffic Controllers and by their proximity to Lindbergh Field's flight takeoff path; they're actually within Class B airspace and as such are limited.
So, if you want to fly there, you need a Remote ID (well, once they're rolled out and the government starts enforcing it as of March 16, 2024). Sure, it's a possibility that they could be granted a FRIA; however, they realistically know their chances are as good as San Diego's NFL team winning the Super Bowl. Oh, wait, San Diego doesn't have an NFL team! So...Yeah. THAT good.
Are there going to be people who are going to puff up and say they're going to fly without it? Sure. Are there going to be people who actually do it? Sure. Are there going to be people who will do it and not get caught? Yep. But there's also a lot of people who are not going to take that chance, and aren't going to have THEIR flying opportunities crushed because someone wanted to be a dingus and insist on flying illegally, bringing attention to their club/flight area.