I believe this is what you are looking for it has (Drone Tag) modules listed along with I assume are all quad copters: https://uasdoc.faa.gov/listDocsHey folks, is there an easy to access list of all the modules that have been approved for remote ID? I can’t seem to come up with one easily on the FAA site. I suppose by September going to need one for my various foamboard fixed wing aircraft.
is that FAA approved? IIRC it has to go through some type of approval process to be valid. it doesn't show up on that "approved" list that @wrangler90 linked.The cheapest ones I have seen so far are add on modules for ArduPilot that run $40-ish.
Cubepilot Cube ID for UAS RemoteID (Serial) - RMRC
The best quality First Person View equipment. Free or discounted shipping on all orders.Drone Racing, RC Airplanes, FPV Cameras, FPV Goggles, Video Transmitters, RC Quads, Drone Antennas, Lipo Batteries, and Ground Station Equipment.All available for amateurs, schools, hobbyists, government, and...www.readymaderc.com
LB
I said the same from day 1. They describe an open system for data to be sent in the clear so as not to lock in any given vendor, etc., but it means that anyone can broadcast whatever they want that follows the protocol. Sure they put in rules about devices not being able to be tampered with, but who is checking? It's likely that ADSB doesn't have many issues because it's a very niche area and the penalties are very steep if they catch you.Here is yet another huge problem with the whole remote id thing. Any of these broadcast signals can be spoofed. There is no signed encryption technology preventing that. ADSB for full scale has the exact same issue.
I have been collecting ADSB data for FlightAware for 9 years. Super simple to receive ADSB with an old phone/tablet and a cheap $12 SDR.I said the same from day 1. They describe an open system for data to be sent in the clear so as not to lock in any given vendor, etc., but it means that anyone can broadcast whatever they want that follows the protocol. Sure they put in rules about devices not being able to be tampered with, but who is checking? It's likely that ADSB doesn't have many issues because it's a very niche area and the penalties are very steep if they catch you.
For millions of hobby users who are already into electronics and computers, I expect the barrier is very low to spoofing RemoteID data. Take a look at Bruce @ Xjet who used the open format of ADSB to make a homemade ADSB alarm to alert folks at their field of approaching aircraft. That type of device makes 10x more sense for safety than RemoteID, but it was never about safety anyway.
This is a list of modules from the AMA as of the beginning of June 2023.Hey folks, is there an easy to access list of all the modules that have been approved for remote ID? I can’t seem to come up with one easily on the FAA site. I suppose by September going to need one for my various foamboard fixed wing aircraft.
This is a list of modules from the AMA as of the beginning of June 2023.
The cheapest ones I have seen so far are add on modules for ArduPilot that run $40-ish.
Cubepilot Cube ID for UAS RemoteID (Serial) - RMRC
The best quality First Person View equipment. Free or discounted shipping on all orders.Drone Racing, RC Airplanes, FPV Cameras, FPV Goggles, Video Transmitters, RC Quads, Drone Antennas, Lipo Batteries, and Ground Station Equipment.All available for amateurs, schools, hobbyists, government, and...www.readymaderc.com
Tamper proof from an unencrypted clear text protocol. What a joke. Spoofing the protocol is so easy a 2 year old could do it. IEEE a well known engineering organization even says this is a flawThose are not FAA approved, nor does it meet the FAA tamper proof requirements, and I don't think they plan on getting FAA approval. They're from Australia (although the board is made in China) and it is primarily for the European market.
The "tamper proof" requirement seems to only be associated with Standard Remote ID - which is what is required to be installed on any UAS post Sept 2022. SRID is will also prohibit takeoff if in a restricted zone and prohibit flight above 400 feet AGL. The purpose of "tamper proof" was to prohibit flying in restricted zones etc. Remote ID modules are not required to prohibit flight, hence the "tamper proof" does not mean it cannot be spoofed or hacked, etc.Tamper proof from an unencrypted clear text protocol. What a joke. Spoofing the protocol is so easy a 2 year old could do it. IEEE a well known engineering organization even says this is a flaw
IEEE Xplore Full-Text PDF:
ieeexplore.ieee.org
One of the comments on youtube made a good point:This right here sums it up nicely
As the video shows, Class G airspace should be unrestricted (because that is the definition of Class G) for ALL aircraft - not just manned aircraft and R/C aircraft OF ALL WEIGHTS.This right here sums it up nicely