FTFC21 - Seaplane Design & Build by Leaded50, Yokosuka 12-Shi Special Flying Boat (H7Y)

leaded50

Legendary member
did water taxi testing today.... with not "perfect result". The floats are set 220mm from fuselage centerline, thats to little!
When a wing tips into water, it clings to the watersurface..and the boyance of floats aint enough to lift it. I can make bigger floats, but it would be easy seen out of scale, so decides rather rework where the floats are mounted. (lucky i did them screwed on, easy to move.. :) ) That will give the outer wings enough boyance by floats.

The camera used wo hoped was ok.. wasnt exactly good... it did make disorted colors, and suddenly ended video after approx 2.5 minuts.

 
did water taxi testing today.... with not "perfect result". The floats are set 220mm from fuselage centerline, thats to little!
When a wing tips into water, it clings to the watersurface..and the boyance of floats aint enough to lift it. I can make bigger floats, but it would be easy seen out of scale, so decides rather rework where the floats are mounted. (lucky i did them screwed on, easy to move.. :) ) That will give the outer wings enough boyance by floats.

The camera used wo hoped was ok.. wasnt exactly good... it did make disorted colors, and suddenly ended video after approx 2.5 minuts.

That's cool. You'll fix it for sure. It's about to fly right now!
 

leaded50

Legendary member
It could flyed today... but not by taking off on water (if done some turns first ;)) Ill fix it soon, for a new test.
So it is with a scratchbuild... you newer know whats ok, or not :LOL:
 

FoamyDM

Building Fool-Flying Noob
Moderator
It still looks great on the water.
That "sticking" effect is a real pain, If you keep the location the same you should be able double the thickness. and extend the arm a bit to provide the buoyancy you need.

Continued luck to you sir. keep at it! :)
 

leaded50

Legendary member
It still looks great on the water.
That "sticking" effect is a real pain, If you keep the location the same you should be able double the thickness. and extend the arm a bit to provide the buoyancy you need.

Continued luck to you sir. keep at it! :)
naaah... double float thickness for sure would helped, but would be looking very "bolbuos" vs the plane. And by extending the arm, the floats would get "too low". Floats on a flying boat is ment for stabilizing on water at slow speed/taxing, and be out of water when it speeds away for take off, with close to only the step in hull at water.

- looks great on water indeed :)
 

leaded50

Legendary member
Floats on a flying boat is ment for stabilizing on water at slow speed/taxing, and be out of water when it speeds away for take off, with close to only the step in hull at water. And on any 3D view of such planes from side,the wing floats will never bee as low as the keel at hull. Such planes goes on keel only approx close to the step, as last waterconnection before take off.
Thats for minimize drag, and use best effect for taking off.

On the H7Y now, it had the recommended 4* degrees, but wingspan was too wide outside of floats, so when wing tipped, it stroke the watersurface, and "clinged" to it.
by moving the floats outward 170mm more from center, it got 9* degrees to tip , still approx 3* degrees vs the keel on hull....and the problem isnt there anymore :)
If wing have had dihedral angle outside of float, this wouldnt happend.

One of the things by the original plane that no info found gave answer on... where the floats was mounted. Only knowledge is that was retractable, and not at tip.
seaplane_guides1.png
 
Last edited: