TooJung2Die
Master member
I think your proportions are spot-on. The height on the top wing looks perfect. It's looking like a Gypsy Moth. The Tiger Moth has swept wings. Won't having the top wing forward of the bottom wing have the side effect of moving the CG forward? With the sturdy tail section and short nose you'll probably be adding some lead to achieve CG.
The first time I encountered this biplane wing incidence difference was building the Guillow's SE5A. When making a jig for mounting the top wing I noticed the difference. I always assumed the wings were supposed to be parallel but the SE5A had a 0 degree top wing and a positive incidence bottom wing. Was this a mistake in the drawing? But how could there be an error in a kit that has been around longer than me? You guys filled me in and assured me that was normal.
The first time I encountered this biplane wing incidence difference was building the Guillow's SE5A. When making a jig for mounting the top wing I noticed the difference. I always assumed the wings were supposed to be parallel but the SE5A had a 0 degree top wing and a positive incidence bottom wing. Was this a mistake in the drawing? But how could there be an error in a kit that has been around longer than me? You guys filled me in and assured me that was normal.